0 thoughts on “The Five Stars of Online Journal Articles”

  1. Interesting approach, though the weakest, least interesting axis is “peer review”. Surely there are transparent ways to review journals based on this criterion, or is it merely “got it” or “don’t got it”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search